Canto 3 -
Araṇya-kāṇḍa
Chapter 30: Khara Destroyed
Text 3.30.23

तमापतन्तं संरब्धं कृतास्त्रो रुधिराप्लुतम्।
अपासर्पत्प्रतिपदं किंचित्त्वरितविक्रमः॥

tam āpatantaṁ saṁrabdhaṁ kṛtāstro rudhirāplutam
apāsarpat pratipadaṁ kiñcit tvarita-vikramaḥ

tam = and Khara; āpatantam = and moving towards [Him]; saṁrabdham = bewildered; kṛta-astraḥ = because He was armed; rudhira-āplutam = was soaked in blood; apāsarpat = He retreated back; pratipadam = for every step [taken by Khara]; kiñcit = slightly; tvarita-vikramaḥ = in urgent strides.

For every step [taken by Khara], He slightly retreated back in urgent strides because He was armed and Khara was soaked in blood, bewildered and moving towards [Him].

[This verse] implies that Rāma retreated back because He had a weapon close to Him and He wanted to get a [good] opportunity to release His weapon [at Khara]. Another reason [for Rāma’s retreat] was that He abhorred having to touch Khara.

The author intends to state here that though slightly retreating back is inappropriate for a hero, there was no way for Rāma to destroy Khara without retreating [in this manner] because sarvato balavatī hy anyathānupapattiḥ, “A necessary supposition rendering other alternatives impossible is the strongest among all [reasons for an argument to be valid].”1

1 One of the principles involved in logical deduction is to necessarily suppose something which renders all other alternatives impossible. The classical textbook example in traditional logic is: A mountain is on fire because though the fire cannot be seen, smoke is seen moving up towards the sky. In this argument, it is axiomatically accepted that smoke is necessarily seen only when there is fire and that there is no alternative cause of smoke. Similarly, a necessary supposition that renders all other alternatives impossible is found in the case of these two logical deductions: (1) Caitra, who is known to be alive, is not at home; therefore, Caitra is outside, and (2) The fat Devadatta does not eat during the day; therefore Devadatta eats at night. Lord Rāma, as a dhārmika warrior, had no alternative to kill Khara other than by slightly retreating back. That is the point made in this portion of the commentary.